Prospectiva Estratégica y su Contribución en la Mejora de las Prácticas de Responsabilidad Social Empresarial: Una Revisión Sistemática

Jorge Eduardo Velez Martell

doi:10.64923/ceniiac.e0007

Autores/as

Jorge Eduardo Velez Martell Universidad San Ignacio de Loyola https://orcid.org/0009-0008-2710-1107

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.64923/ceniiac.e0007

Palabras clave:

prospectiva estratégica, Responsabilidad Social Empresarial, sostenibilidad, revisión sistemática, gestión organizacional, América Latina

Resumen

Este estudio presenta una revisión sistemática de la literatura científica publicada entre 2020 y 2025 sobre la relación entre la prospectiva estratégica y la responsabilidad social empresarial. Se aplicaron procedimientos metodológicos estructurados conforme a la guía PRISMA 2020, con la búsqueda y análisis de artículos en bases de datos académicas internacionales. De un total de 180 registros identificados, 32 estudios cumplieron con los criterios de inclusión y calidad, y fueron incorporados en la síntesis final. El análisis se desarrolló mediante una síntesis temática cualitativa que permitió identificar enfoques conceptuales y aplicaciones prácticas. Los resultados evidencian que la prospectiva estratégica contribuye al fortalecimiento de la responsabilidad social empresarial al mejorar la capacidad de anticipación, fomentar la innovación y alinear las decisiones con los objetivos de sostenibilidad. Se concluye que integrar la prospectiva estratégica en la gestión organizacional impulsa una cultura de planificación responsable, resiliente y orientada al futuro, consolidando su papel como un eje clave en la transformación sostenible de las organizaciones.

Palabras clave: prospectiva estratégica; Responsabilidad Social Empresarial; sostenibilidad; Revisión sistemática; gestión organizacional; América Latina.

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.

Biografía del autor/a

Jorge Eduardo Velez Martell, Universidad San Ignacio de Loyola

Civil Engineer with professional experience in the planning, management, and execution of infrastructure projects in Peru. He holds an MBA from ESAN and professional training in Business Agility from CENTRUM PUCP. He is currently a PhD candidate in Business Administration at Universidad San Ignacio de Loyola (USIL). His academic background integrates engineering, management, and organizational studies applied to the construction sector.

Citas

Barauskaite, G., & Streimikiene, D. (2021). Corporate social responsibility and financial performance of companies: The puzzle of concepts, definitions and assessment methods. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 28(1), 278-287. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2048

Belk, R. W., Belanche, D., & Flavián, C. (2023). Key concepts in artificial intelligence and technologies 4.0 in services. Service Business, 17(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11628-023-00528-w

Brandtner, P., & Mates, M. (2021). Artificial intelligence in strategic foresight – Current practices and future application potentials: Current practices and future application potentials. In Proceedings of the 2021 12th International Conference on E-business, Management and Economics (ICEME '21) (pp. 75–81). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/3481127.3481177

Booth, A., Sutton, A., & Papaioannou, D. (2016). Systematic approaches to a successful literature review (2nd ed.). SAGE Publications. https://goo.su/X3HqI

Calof, J., Meissner, D., & Vishnevskiy, K. (2020). Corporate foresight for strategic innovation management: the case of a Russian service company. Foresight, 22(1), 14-36. https://doi.org/10.1108/FS-02-2019-0011

Carayannis, E. G., Dumitrescu, R., Falkowski, T., Papamichail, G., & Zota, N. R. (2025). Enhancing SME Resilience through Artificial Intelligence and Strategic Foresight: A Framework for Sustainable Competitiveness. Technology in Society, 102835. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2025.102835

Demneh, M. T., Zackery, A., & Nouraei, A. (2023). Using corporate foresight to enhance strategic management practices. European Journal of Futures Research, 11, 5. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40309-023-00217-x

Fathi, M., Yousefi, N., Vatanpour, H., & Mohammadi, R. (2021). The effect of organizational resilience and strategic foresight on firm performance: competitive advantage as mediating variable. Iranian Journal of Pharmaceutical Research, 20(4), 497-510. https://doi.org/10.22037/ijpr.2021.116145.15723

Fergnani, A. (2022). Corporate foresight: A new frontier for strategy and management. Academy of Management Perspectives, 36(2), 820-844. https://doi.org/10.5465/amp.2018.0178

Fergnani, A., Hines, A., Lanteri, A., & Esposito, M. (2020). Corporate foresight in an ever-turbulent era. European business review, 25, 26-33. https://goo.su/Wtm98

Gordon, A. V., Ramic, M., Rohrbeck, R., & Spaniol, M. J. (2020). 50 Years of corporate and organizational foresight: Looking back and going forward. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 154, 119966. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.119966

Hernández-Sampieri, R., Fernández, C., & Baptista, M. del P. (2022). Metodología de la investigación (7.ª ed.). McGraw-Hill. https://goo.su/yZAzvY

Kitchenham, B. (2004). Procedures for performing systematic reviews. Keele University. https://www.inf.ufsc.br/~aldo.vw/kitchenham.pdf

Linares-Barbero, C., & De La Vega, I. (2024). The impact of strategic foresight on innovation: A systematic literature review. IEEE Engineering Management Review. https://doi.org/10.1109/EMR.2024.3454630

Lu, J., Ren, L., Zhang, C., Rong, D., Ahmed, R. R., & Streimikis, J. (2020). Modified Carroll’s pyramid of corporate social responsibility to enhance organizational performance of SMEs industry. Journal of Cleaner Production, 271, 122456. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122456

Marinković, M., Al-Tabbaa, O., Khan, Z., & Wu, J. (2022). Corporate foresight: A systematic literature review and future research tra-jectories. Journal of Business Research, 144, 289-311. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.01.097

Mohammadi, R. (2023). The role of strategic foresight on dynamic capabilities. International Journal of Innovation in Management, Economics and Social Sciences, 3(1), 40-45. https://doi.org/10.52547/ijimes.3.1.40

Moscoso-Paucarchuco, K. M. (2024). Integrating environmental auditing and corporate social responsibility in Peru. Prometeica, 31, 95–108 https://doi.org/10.34024/prometeica.2024.31.18798

Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., … Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 372, n71. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71

Petticrew, M., & Roberts, H. (2006). Systematic reviews in the social sciences: A practical guide. Blackwell Publish-ing. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470754887

Spaniol, M. J., & Rowland, N. J. (2022). Business ecosystems and the view from the future: The use of corporate foresight by stake-holders of the Ro-Ro shipping ecosystem in the Baltic Sea Region. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 184, 121966. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2022.121966

Teece, D. J. (2007). Explicating dynamic capabilities: The nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance. Strategic Management Journal, 28(13), 1319–1350. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.640

Tranfield, D., Denyer, D., & Smart, P. (2003). Towards a methodology for developing evidence‐informed management knowledge by means of systematic review. British Journal of Management, 14(3), 207–222. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.00375

Van der Duin, P., Trott, P., & Marzi, G. (2024). Tomorrow is already here: Exploring how corporate foresight can contribute to ambi-dexterity. Strategic Change, 33(3), 187-200. https://doi.org/10.1002/jsc.2574

Wiener, M., Gattringer, R., & Strehl, F. (2020). Collaborative open foresight-A new approach for inspiring discontinuous and sustainabil-ity-oriented innovations. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 155, 119370. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2018.07.008