Brechas en la transformación digital de la salud pública en América Latina
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.64923/ceniiac.e0004Palabras clave:
transformación digital, salud pública, desigualdades en salud, América Latina, salud digital, bibliometríaResumen
Este estudio bibliométrico analiza de manera sistemática la evolución de la investigación sobre la transformación digital en la salud pública en América Latina, identificando áreas desatendidas y tendencias emergentes. A partir del análisis de 576 documentos recuperados de Scopus, el estudio examina la distribución geográfica de la producción científica, los principales enfoques metodológicos y los temas predominantes. Los resultados revelan un crecimiento constante en la producción científica global, con Europa y Asia liderando el campo, mientras que América Latina muestra una participación limitada y desigual. Brasil destaca como el país con mayor número de publicaciones, seguido a distancia por Argentina, Perú y México. El análisis temático indica que conceptos como “salud digital” y “transformación digital” son centrales, mientras que áreas como la “interoperabilidad de la información en salud” y la “alfabetización en salud digital” permanecen poco exploradas. Las brechas identificadas ponen de manifiesto la necesidad de fortalecer la producción científica en la región mediante políticas de colaboración, inversión en infraestructura digital y marcos regulatorios que promuevan la equidad en la adopción de tecnologías sanitarias. El estudio concluye que, a pesar de los avances de la investigación sobre la transformación digital en la salud pública, persisten desafíos estructurales que deben abordarse para lograr una integración efectiva de la digitalización en los sistemas de salud de América Latina.
Descargas
Citas
Aria, M., & Cuccurullo, C. (2017). bibliometrix : An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis. Journal of Informetrics, 11(4), 959–975. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2017.08.007
Baas, J., Schotten, M., Plume, A., Côté, G., & Karimi, R. (2020). Scopus as a curated, high-quality bibliometric data source for academic research in quantitative science studies. Quantitative Science Studies, 1(1), 377–386. https://doi.org/10.1162/qss_a_00019
Borges do Nascimento, I. J., Abdulazeem, H., Vasanthan, L. T., Martinez, E. Z., Zucoloto, M. L., Østengaard, L., Azzopardi-Muscat, N., Zapata, T., & Novillo-Ortiz, D. (2023). Barriers and facilitators to utilizing digital health technologies by healthcare professionals. Npj Digital Medicine, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41746-023-00899-4
Capasso, A., Colomar, M., Ramírez, D., Serruya, S., & de Mucio, B. (2024). Digital health and the promise of equity in maternity care: A mixed methods multi-country assessment on the use of information and communication technologies in healthcare facilities in Latin America and the Caribbean. PLoS ONE, 19(2 February). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0298902
De Fatima Marin, H., De Souza Zinader, J. P., Da Silva Pires, F. J., & De Barros, J. V. (2022). The Brazilian digital health system: Building the digital transformation to engage country citizens. In Roadmap to Successful Digital Health Ecosystems: A Global Perspective (pp. 473–487). https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-823413-6.00003-3
De La Cruz-Ramirez, Y. M., Cortez-Orellana, S. A., Olaza-Maguiña, A. F., & De La Cruz-Ramirez, N. T. (2022). Technological Acces-sibility and Digital Health Education Associated with the Use of Smart Healthcare by Obstetricians in Peru. Communications in Computer and Information Science, 1648 CCIS, 101–113. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-18272-3_8
Delgado, R. M. (2022). Without IPv6, there is no digital transformation for healthcare. Technology and Health Care, 30(2), 505–508. https://doi.org/10.3233/THC-213571
Derviş, H. (2020). Bibliometric Analysis using Bibliometrix an R Package. Journal of Scientometric Research, 8(3), 156–160. https://doi.org/10.5530/jscires.8.3.32
Donthu, N., Kumar, S., Mukherjee, D., Pandey, N., & Lim, W. M. (2021). How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 133, 285–296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.04.070
Farias, M. A., Badino, M., Marti, M., Báscolo, E., Saisó, S. G., & D’Agostino, M. (2023). Digital transformation as a strategy to strengthen essential public health functions in the Americas. Revista Panamericana de Salud Publica/Pan American Journal of Public Health, 47. https://doi.org/10.26633/RPSP.2023.150
Garcia Alonso, R., Thoene, U., & Davila Benavides, D. (2022). Digital Health and Artificial Intelligence: Advancing Healthcare Provision in Latin America. IT Professional, 24(2), 62–68. https://doi.org/10.1109/MITP.2022.3143530
Godoy, J. A., Ríos, C., Venegas, P., López, C., Álvarez, J. L., Labbé, T. P., Ramírez, C., & Ríos, J. A. (2020). Digital health services as a means to control dementia. Revista Medica de Chile, 148(7), 1018–1024. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0034-98872020000701018
Karunarathne, T., & Monteiro, J. (2023). User-centric and secure electronic authentication for digital health services: a case study for Brazil. ACM International Conference Proceeding Series, 151–158. https://doi.org/10.1145/3614321.3614339
Kulkanjanapiban, P., & Silwattananusarn, T. (2022). Comparative analysis of Dimensions and Scopus bibliographic data sources: An approach to university research productivity. International Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering, 12(1), 706–720. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijece.v12i1.pp706-720
McAllister, J. T., Lennertz, L., & Atencio Mojica, Z. (2022). Mapping A Discipline: A Guide to Using VOSviewer for Bibliometric and Visual Analysis. Science and Technology Libraries, 41(3), 319–348. https://doi.org/10.1080/0194262X.2021.1991547
Meyer, D. Z., & Avery, L. M. (2009). Excel as a Qualitative Data Analysis Tool. Field Methods, 21(1), 91–112. https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822X08323985
Mukherjee, D., Lim, W. M., Kumar, S., & Donthu, N. (2022). Guidelines for advancing theory and practice through bibliometric research. Journal of Business Research, 148, 101–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.04.042
Neyeloff, J. L., Fuchs, S. C., & Moreira, L. B. (2012). Meta-analyses and Forest plots using a microsoft excel spreadsheet: step-by-step guide focusing on descriptive data analysis. BMC Research Notes, 5(1), 52. https://doi.org/10.1186/1756-0500-5-52
Portilho, L., & Ribeiro, M. M. (2024). DIGITAL TRANSFORMATION IN THE HEALTHCARE SECTOR IN BRAZIL AND THE EFFECTS OF THE PANDEMIC ON PUBLIC HEALTH. International Conferences E-Society 2024 and Mobile Learning 2024, 13–19. https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85203591968&partnerID=40&md5=8185440ad851bbf4f76c1a0ea69cc096
Pranckutė, R. (2021). Web of Science (WoS) and Scopus: the titans of bibliographic information in today’s academic world. Publications, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.3390/publications9010012
Rocha, P., Pinheiro, D., de Paula Monteiro, R., Tubert, E., Romero, E., Bastos-Filho, C., Nuno, M., & Cadeiras, M. (2023). Adaptive Content Tuning of Social Network Digital Health Interventions Using Control Systems Engineering for Precision Public Health: Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 25. https://doi.org/10.2196/43132
Stein, A. T., Ben, Â. J., Pachito, D. V, Cazella, S. C., Dongen, J. M., & Bosmans, J. E. (2021). Digital health technology implementation: Is it effective in a healthy healthcare perspective? In Integrating the Organization of Health Services, Worker Wellbeing and Quality of Care: Towards Healthy Healthcare (pp. 197–220). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-59467-1_9
Todeschini, R., & Baccini, A. (2016). Handbook of Bibliometric Indicators: Quantitative Tools for Studying and Evaluating Research. https://doi.org/10.1002/9783527681969
Tortorella, G. L., Fogliatto, F. S., Tlapa Mendoza, D., Pepper, M., & Capurro, D. (2023). Digital transformation of health services: a value stream-oriented approach. International Journal of Production Research, 61(6), 1814–1828. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2022.2048115
Zupic, I., & Čater, T. (2015). Bibliometric Methods in Management and Organization. Organizational Research Methods, 18(3), 429–472. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428114562629
Descargas
Archivos adicionales
Publicado
Cómo citar
Número
Sección
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2025 Evelyn María Espina

Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución 4.0.
Ceniiac © 2025 by Negocios Globales is licensed under CC BY 4.0
